RESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) poses a challenge to hospitals for the prevention and control of public health emergencies. As the main battlefield of preventing and controlling COVID-19, large public hospitals should develop service protocols of diagnosis and treatment for outpatient, emergency, hospitalization, surgery, and discharge. The construction of medical protocols should be based on the risk factors of key points and focused on pre-inspection triage and screening, to establish a rapid response mechanism to deal with exogenous and endogenous risk factors. Implementation of all-staff training and assessment, strengthening the information system, and use of medical internet service are important. This study explores the construction of medical protocols in large public hospitals during the pandemic, and provides a reference for the orderly diagnosis and treatment in hospitals during the pandemic.Copyright © 2021, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. All rights reserved.
RESUMEN
Aims: Globally, mental illness and substance use disorders are the leading cause of disability and disease burden for young people. Orygen is an Australian youth mental health organization with a mission to reduce the impact of mental ill-health on young people, families and society, and one of only a few known research and clinical centres with a dedicated Knowledge Translation division. This paper provides a case study of the workforce development team within Orygen Knowledge Translation, outlining how implementation science informs their work and how the division has adapted its model of service support in the face of COVID-19. Method(s): Process data on training and resources developed and delivered by the workforce development team at Orygen over the period 2017-2021 was collated and synthesized with team reflections about the adaptations made by team in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results and Conclusion(s): Since 2017, the team has delivered training to more than 4000 youth mental health workers across Australia, on the topics of trauma, psychosis, mood and anxiety disorders, brief interventions, cognition and other areas of youth mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic generated abrupt and dramatic changes to the delivery of workforce and service development initiatives in Australia due to significant restrictions to travel and in-person events. It also placed major delivery demands on youth mental health services. The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated profound and rapid changes to service delivery and development in Australian youth mental health. Implementation science offers flexible models to support a changing system.
RESUMEN
Submission content Introduction: Intensive care medicine has become an admired, loved, hated, and definitely more interesting Specialty due to a special situation (COVID-19) that exposed the training process to numerous criticisms, positives, and negatives, and this is how I believe we could improve our beloved world. Proposal: 1. Ideal training program from medical school to Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT): * Medical school: In their last year they should do more than 1 week in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) * Stage 1: there should be a core surgical training of at least 6 months * Stage 2: there should be a rotation on Psychiatry of at least 4 weeks with on calls in ICU and 2 weeks in Palliative Care * Stage 3: acting as a consultant for the last six months on ST7 with backup from a formal consultant, and * Surgical training should be included in the possible dual or triple CCT 2. How would we be assessed? I agree with the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) staging program assessment, with some modifications: * As ST7 the trainee should act as a consultant with back support at least 50% of the stage and need to be evaluated by a Multi-Source Feedback (MSF). * Clinical Fellows should have a consultant as a Certificate of Eligibility for Specialist Registration (CESR) guide who establishes the equivalent stage of training supporting them and assessing them under the same model. * Changing the way, the General Medical Council (GMC) conducts the CESR application and making it really equivalent to the ICM training with the FFICM curriculum. 3. What do we need to be taught? * Hot topics for ICU (academic), * Overseas talks to share experiences, * Ultrasound (FUSIC), * Wellbeing strategies, * Leadership training * Psychiatric and physiological effects post ICU for patients and staff, * The administrative and political model of the National Health Service (NHS), and * Communication skills to establish excellent relationships with the other specialties. 4. What would our working life look like? * Normal day: 8 am to 3 pm * Midday shift: 1 pm to 8:30 pm * Night shift: 8 pm to 8:30 am * A rolling rota of 12 weeks with 2 weekends during this time 5. How would you produce Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) Consultants of the future who both love their job and their life: * Starting with less intense shifts, * More cordial relationships between the teams, * Supporting ICM trainees and Fellows going through their CESR pathway, * Making the training more attractive to either male-female doctors getting them involved in as many different specialties as ICM can cover, Conclusion(s): Having full-time ICM Consultants should be welcome in all ICUs in the country, which is not at the moment. This will definitely attract a lot of excellent doctors who are 100% focused on ICM.
RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted society: causing the collapse of health systems around the world, and also had a significant impact on the economy, personal care, mental health and the quality of life of the population. Few studies have been done about pandemic and the climacteric population, and the impact on quality of life and health. Our objective was to Investigate changes in the health and health care of climacteric women residing in Brazil during the pandemic period. Cross-sectional study with climacteric women aged between 40 and 70 years, residing in Brazil. The evaluation was carried out using a Google Docs electronic form with questions related to sociodemographic, clinical, gynecological data, treatments, access to health services and consultations, as well as changes in behavior. The Menopause Rating Scale - MRS was applied to assess climacteric symptoms, validated for Portuguese. Result(s): 419 women answered the questionnaire. More than 45% were between 51 and 60 years of age, 56.6% being married and residing in Brazilian capitals. 60% of participants reported weight gain during the pandemic. 50.8% of participants reported a decrease in the weekly practice of physical activity More than 80% reported worsening mental health during this period, and 66.1% had a change in their sleep pattern. More than half reported having difficulty accessing gynecological consultations. Women living in capital cities reported a greater increase in alcohol consumption (p=0.002). Food intake increased for 54.9%;the category of civil servant was associated with a significant increase in consumption in relation to other professions (p=0.038). Women whose family incomes changed during the pandemic had a higher prevalence of weight gain (p=0.033) and also had a higher occurrence of changes in sleep quality (72.6% vs. 61.5%;p=0.018). Women with a high school education had a higher occurrence of alterations in personal and health care outcomes (p<0.001). Conclusion(s): We observed an important reduction in the health care of climacteric women during the pandemic period. Changes in life habits, such as increased food consumption and reduced physical activity, were quite prevalent. There was a deterioration in mental health, with a high prevalence of anxiety symptoms and changes in sleep quality. Despite the attenuation of the pandemic, attention should be given to the health care of this population, as the changes may have repercussions for many years.Copyright © 2023
RESUMEN
Aims: The DisCOVery study sought to better understand the experiences of young people with complex emerging mental health problems over the longer-term social restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Following the 'social cure' theory, this study aimed to investigate the association, and potential mechanisms, of group membership continuity and reducing mental ill-health amongst vulnerable young people. Method(s): Cross-sectional survey data from a sample of 105 young people aged 16-35, collected approximately 1 year after the global COVID-19 outbreak (January-July 2021). Correlational and path analyses were used to test the associations between group membership continuity and mental health problems (depression, anxiety, psychotic-like experiences), and the mediation of these associations by hope and social connectedness (in-person and online). Results and Conclusion(s): Prior multiple group memberships were associated with the preservation of group memberships during the COVID-19 pandemic. In-person social connectedness, online social connectedness and hope mediated the relationship between group membership continuity and mental health problem symptoms. The results suggest that clinical and public health practice should support vulnerable young people to foster and maintain their social group memberships, hopefulness and perceived sense of social connectedness as a means to potentially help prevent exacerbated symptoms and promote recovery of mental health problems, particularly during significant life events.
RESUMEN
Aims: Youth are increasingly seeking health information through online platforms, such as websites, social media, and online forums. TikTok emerged as a popular platform for disseminating and consuming health information during the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, this study aimed to explore how youth used TikTok to access information about mental health and mental health services during the pandemic. Method(s): Twenty-one interviews were conducted over Zoom with youth (ages 12-24) who lived in British Columbia, Canada and had accessed TikTok for mental health information during the pandemic. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically using an inductive approach. Result(s): Youth described TikTok as a safe place to talk about mental health and share personal experiences. This helped youth feel less alone with their struggles and facilitated conversations about mental health with friends, family, and service providers. Participants also described how mental health content on TikTok helped them be more mindful of their own mental health and the different resources and coping strategies available and encouraged them to seek services. For those hesitant or unable to access services, TikTok provided immediate support. Youth appreciated the ease of accessing this information, given the platform's engaging and digestible format (i.e., short videos) and predictive nature of its algorithm. However, participants expressed concerns with the spread of misinformation and the lack of verifiable information on the platform. Conclusion(s): TikTok is as a practical platform to disseminate mental health information to youth. However, efforts to establish strategies for preventing and reporting misinformation are warranted.
RESUMEN
Disparities in the incidence, prevalence, and morbidity and mortality rates of many respiratory diseases are evident among ethnic groups. Biological, cultural and environmental factors related to ethnicity can all contribute to the differences in respiratory health observed among ethnic minority groups, but the inequalities observed are most commonly due to lower socioeconomic position. People who migrate within a country or across an international border may experience an improvement in respiratory health associated with improvements in socioeconomic position. However, migrants may also experience worse health outcomes in destination countries, as they are faced by barriers in language and culture, discrimination, exclusion and limited access to health services. While some high-quality studies investigating ethnicity and respiratory health are available, further research into ethnic differences is needed. Improving the recording of ethnicity in health records, addressing barriers to accessing respiratory healthcare and improving cultural literacy more generally are some of the ways that inequalities can be tackled.Copyright © ERS 2023.
RESUMEN
Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic presented new difficulties for integrated healthcare worldwide. Our study aims to highlight developing needs for cooperation while describing structures and practices of consultation liaison (CL) services established during pandemic across Europe. Method(s): The cross-sectional survey used an ONLINE self-developed 25-item questionnaire in four language versions (English, French, Italian, German). Dissemination was via national professional societies cooperating in EAPM, and heads of CL services from June to October 2021 Results: 259 hospital CL services took part in the study (28.0% response rate). 222 (85.7%) of these services reported providing COVID-19-related mental health care (COVIDpsyCare). Among them, 192 services (86.5%) reported the development of specialized COVID-psyCare co-operation arrangements. 135 services (50.8%) provided specific COVID-psyCare for patients, 85 (38.2%) for relatives, and 171 (77.0%) for staff, with 56.3%, 14.6%, and 23.7% of time resources invested for these groups, respectively. Interventions for hospital staff, commonly related to the liaison function of CL services, were rated as being the most helpful. Regarding newly emerging demands, 129 (58.1%) CL services stated a need for communication and support among themselves concerning COVID-psyCare, and 142 (64.0%) suggested certain adjustments or enhancements that they thought were crucial for the future. Conclusion(s): Specific structure to provide COVID mental health care for patients, their relatives, or staff were implemented in over 80% of the participating CL services. Resources were primarily allocated for patient care, and staff assistance was mostly achieved through the implementation of specialized interventions. COVID psyCare's development calls for further intra- and interinstitutional cooperation.Copyright © 2023
RESUMEN
Aims: People with psychotic and bipolar disorders were particularly vulnerable to poor mental health and wellbeing in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, their subjective experience of what they were most worried about concerning the pandemic, what contributed most to how they were doing, and what they suggest the mental health services could do to improve care during a pandemic, requires investigation. Method(s): Three months after the outbreak of COVID-19, 520 people with psychotic and bipolar disorders responded to an online survey about the pandemic impact on mental health and wellbeing, including three open-ended questions. The material was analysed using thematic analysis. Result(s): The participants' main worries were: fear of the virus itself;fear of protective measures;fear of a completely changed world;fear of social consequences;and fear of poor mental health. These worries involved others as much as themselves. Participants' experience of main positive contributors were: a slower pace of life;more time to reflect;maintaining daily routine;keeping up social contact;and mental health service availability. The most prominent suggestions to improved mental health services were: stay open;be proactive;and individualize treatment. Conclusion(s): In the early stages of the pandemic people with psychotic and bipolar disorders were equally worried about the pandemic consequences for others and the world at large, not just for themselves. Positive contributors to wellbeing included increased calm and time to respite. They suggested that mental health services remain available and flexible during future pandemics.
RESUMEN
Background: Stratified care aims at matching the intensity and setting of mental health interventions to the needs of help-seeking Young People. In Australia, a 5-tiered system of mental health services is in operation. To aid patient triage to the most appropriate tier, a Decision Support Tool (DST) has been developed and is being rolled out nationally Methods: We analysed outcome data pre-and post-enrolment of about 1500 Young People (aged 16-25) referred to a Youth Mental Health Service delivering medium- and high intensity psychological treatment programs (tiers 3 and 4). We compared outcomes in both tiers during three 12-month periods: (a) in the inaugural phase of tier 4, prior to service saturation and stringent triaging, and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (2019);(b) during the COVID-19 pandemic when all services were delivered remotely over phone- and video facilities, and when DST triaging was introduced (2020);(c) following return of face-to-face consultations, in a situation of service saturation and stringent DST triaging (2021) Findings: About 22% of Young People in the tier 3 program experienced reliable improvement according to their Kessler-10 (K-10) scale ratings, regardless of changing circumstances. In contrast, 40% of people in the tier 4 program reliably improved during the inaugural phase When circumstances and service delivery changed (COVID-19 restrictions service saturation, DST triaging), the rate of reliable improvement halved to about 20% Conclusion(s): Access to higher intensity psychological programs improves treatment outcomes for help-seeking Young People. However high-intensity services are more sensitive to external and service factors than less intense treatment models.
RESUMEN
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed major changes in how youth mental health (MH) services are delivered. Understanding youth's MH, awareness and use of services since the pandemic, and differences between youth with and without a MH diagnosis, can help us optimize MH services during the pandemic and beyond. Objective(s): We investigated youth's MH and service use one year into the pandemic and explored differences between those with and without a self-reported MH diagnosis. Method(s): In February 2021, we administered a web-based survey to youth, 12-25 years, in Ontario. Data from 1373 out of 1497 (91.72%) participants were analyzed. We assessed differences in MH and service use between those with (N=623, 45.38%) and without (N=750, 54.62%) a self-reported MH diagnosis. Logistic regressions were used to explore MH diagnosis as a predictor of service use while controlling for confounders. Result(s): 86.73% of participants reported worse MH since COVID-19, with no between-group differences. Participants with a MH diagnosis had higher rates of MH problems, service awareness and use, compared to those without a diagnosis. MH diagnosis was the strongest predictor of service use. Gender and affordability of basic needs also independently predicted use of distinct services. Conclusion(s): Various services are required to mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic on youth MH and meet their service needs. Whether youth have a MH diagnosis may be important to understanding what services they are aware of and use. Sustaining pandemic-related service changes require increasing youth's awareness of digital interventions and overcoming other barriers to care.Copyright © 2023, Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. All rights reserved.
RESUMEN
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in young age groups (chil-dren, adolescents, and young adults) has a higher prevalence than individuals at other stages of the lifecycle. The implementation of mental health services faces more barriers to professional care than in the pre-pandemic period. This study aims to identify the effect of sociodemographic and Public Health and Sosial Measures on the mental health of young age groups and mental health services during the COV-ID-19 pandemic. We conducted a mixed-methods-integrated approach to synthesize the findings and drew results using mixed-methods analysis. Literature finding was conducted in seven databases. The selection procedure followed the f low diagram of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Inclusion criteria included all types of research that looked at the impact of COVID-19 on mental health and mental health services. There are 44 articles included, and the quality assessment shows that the study was evaluated as 80% and 100% quality criteria met. During the implementation of Public Health and Social Measures, the young age group experienced mental health problems, including stress, depression, anxiety, sleeping disorder, eating disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder related to socioeconomic status, academic, and social factors. This systematic review proves that the COVID-19 pandemic affects the mental health of the young age group and mental health services. © 2022, Universitas Negeri Semarang. All rights reserved.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the US with an estimated 236,740 new cases and 130,180 deaths expected in 2022. While early detection with low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality by at least 20%, there has been a low uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) use in the US. The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption in cancer screening. Yet, little is known about how COVID-19 impacted already low use of LCS. This study aims to estimate LCS use before (2019) and during (2020 and 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic among LCS-eligible population in the US. Method(s): We used population-based, nationally representative, cross-section data from the 2019 (n=4,484), 2020 (n=1,239) and 2021 (n=1,673) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Lung Cancer Screening module. The outcome was self-reported LCS use among eligible adults in the past 12 months. For 2019 and 2020, the eligibility was defined based on US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) initial criteria-adults aged 55 to 80 years old, who were current and former smokers (had quit within the past 15 years) with at least 30 pack years of smoking history. For 2021, we used the USPSTF updated criteria- adults aged 50 to 80 years, current and former smokers (who had quit within the past 15 years) with at least 20 pack years of smoking history. We applied sampling weights to account for the complex survey design to generate population estimates and conducted weighted descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. Result(s): Overall, there were an estimated 1,559,137 LCS-eligible respondents from 16 US states in 2019 (AZ, ID, KY, ME, MN, MS, MT, NC, ND, PA, RI, SC, UT, VT, WV, WI), 200,301 LCS-eligible respondents from five states in 2020 (DE, ME, NJ, ND, SD), and 668,359 LCS-eligible respondents from four states in 2021 (ME, MI, NJ, RI). Among 2,427,797 LCS-eligible adults, 254,890;38,875;and 122,240 individuals reported receiving LCS in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Overall, 16.4% (95% CI 14.4-18.5), 19.4% (95% CI 15.3-24.3), and 18.3% (95% CI 15.6-21.3) received LCS during 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. In all years, the proportion of LCS use was higher among adults aged 65-74, insured, those with fair and poor health, lung disease and history of cancer (other than lung cancer). In 2020, a higher proportion of adults living in urban areas reported receiving LCS compared to those living in rural areas (20.36% vs. 12.7%, p=0.01). Compared to non-Hispanic White adults, the odds of receiving LCS was lower among Hispanic adults and higher among Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native adults in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Conclusion(s): LCS uptake remains low in the US. An estimated 2,011,792 adults at high-risk for developing lung cancer did not receive LCS during 2019, 2020 and 2021. Efforts should be focused to increase LCS awareness and uptake across the US to reduce lung cancer burden.
RESUMEN
Objectives: The study aims to determine the influence of the efficiency of the cervical cancer program on the budget execution during the COVID-19 pandemic years 2020- 2021. Method(s): Estimating the screened women and using a micro-costing analysis to estimate the cost of treating precancerous lesions and cervical cancer in the pandemic and a non-pandemic scenario during 2020 -2021. Finally, the estimation of the budget execution for the cervical cancer program led by the Ministry of Health in the pandemic and non-pandemic scenarios. The estimation in the study was through two scenarios determined, the pandemic and non-pandemic scenarios during the years 2020 and 2021. After that, it was determined the number of screened and non-screened women. The next step was the cost estimation of the low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and cervical cancer at different stages. Therefore, this information is necessary for the Peruvian Ministry of Health to provide healthcare services to patients who did not get screened in the years 2020 and 2021. Result(s): The non-pandemic scenario would be spent USD 33,547,185 and USD 37,428,997 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Conversely, in the pandemic scenario, spent USD 9,934,440 and USD 23,762,073 by 2020 and 2021. Therefore, by 2020 must be spent 68.7% of the budget, but only had been spent 20.3%. Moreover, in 2021, only 46.7% of the budget was spent when it should be 73.6% of the total budget. Therefore, USD 39,496,476 and USD 27,114,114 were not executed in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Conclusion(s): A total of USD 66,610,590 was the non-executed budget for the cervical program and needs to be reallocated in the following years to provide healthcare services to the women who did not get access to screening and treatment.Copyright © 2023
RESUMEN
Health inequalities in respiratory disease are widespread, and monitoring them is important for advocacy, the design and delivery of health services, and informing wider health policy. In this chapter, we introduce the different ways in which health inequalities can be quantified, including measures that quantify absolute and relative inequalities, and those that measure gaps between groups or differences across the entire social gradient. We consider the strengths and limitations of these different approaches and highlight things to look out for when reading a paper on health inequalities in respiratory health. These include how common the outcome is and whether other factors have been adjusted for, as both can have a crucial impact on interpretation and can lead to misleading conclusions.Copyright © ERS 2023.
RESUMEN
Telemedicine is a modality which utilizes technology to provide and support health care across large distances. It has redefined the practices of medicine in many specialties and continues to be a boon for clinicians on many frontiers. Its role in the branch of anesthesia remains largely unexplored but has shown to be beneficial in all the three phases: pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative. Now time has come that anesthesiologists across the globe reassess their strategies and utilize the telemedicine facilities in the field of anesthesia.Copyright © 2021 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.
RESUMEN
Risk and predisposing factors for viral zoonoses abound in the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region with significant public health implications. For several decades, there have been several reports on the emergence and re-emergence of arbovirus infections. The lifetime burden of arboviral diseases in developing countries is still poorly understood. Studies indicate significant healthcare disruptions and economic losses attributed to the viruses in resource-poor communities marked by impairment in the performance of daily activities. Arboviruses have reportedly evolved survival strategies to aid their proliferation in favorable niches, further magnifying their public health relevance. However, there is poor knowledge about the viruses in the region. Thus, this review presents a survey of zoonotic arboviruses in SSA, the burden associated with their diseases, management of diseases as well as their prevention and control, mobility and determinants of infections, their vectors, and co-infection with various microorganisms. Lessons learned from the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic coupled with routine surveillance of zoonotic hosts for these viruses will improve our understanding of their evolution, their potential to cause a pandemic, control and prevention measures, and vaccine development.Copyright © GERMS 2022.